Bathsheba Syndrome
As
the news media and the American public become all hot and bothered over the
breaking David Petraeus sex scandal, many are using the phrase “the Bathsheba
Syndrome” to identify the cause. It refers to the story of King David and
Bathsheba from the Old Testament of the Bible and other traditions. It is an apt
story/myth to describe the abuses of power that sometimes befall a successful (and
previously ethical) man. We’ve seen so many men, so many of our leaders (and a
few women and as the glass ceiling continues to be dismantled we will probably
see more) fall into this trap. The seeds of the downfall are sowed in the very
ground of success.
The
term was coined in a paper called: The
Bathsheba Syndrome: The Ethical Failure of Successful Leaders by Dean C.
Ludwig and Clinton O. Longenecker, published in the Journal of Business Ethics in 1993. [Link to the paper] The authors
were looking at the business impact of leaders whose moral failings occur in
part due to their success. There was also an interesting article in Stars and Stripes this last March called
Do fired Navy COs suffer from ‘Bathsheba
Syndrome? by Wyatt Olson that references the other article and brought it
much deserved attention. [Link to the article]
David and Bathsheba story/myth
David
went from being a shepherd to the King. He slew the giant Goliath with his
sling and a stone. He was a righteous man who believed in and spoke for the one
true God. God rewarded David by having him replace King Saul to become King. He
had a fast rise to power and wealth.
After
conquering everyone around Israel and Judah, expanding the boundaries of his
Kingdom, and the pressures of ruling, King David grew complacent. When fighting
season came around he sent his chief of command, Joab, out with the army to
fight the Ammonites rather than go himself as Kings were expected to do. He
stayed home. One night he was strolling on the terrace of his palace that built
high to give him a vantage over his kingdom. While strolling, he looked down
and saw a woman bathing on her rooftop. The bible says “She was very beautiful
to look upon.” (The Jewish Midrash says that Satan came in the form of a bird
and knocked down the screen shielding Bathsheba.)
David
enquired of his servants who she was. The answer came back she’s Bathsheba, the
wife of Uriah the Hittite, one of your generals, and the granddaughter of one
of your most trusted advisors. He sent for her. She came unto him. He came into
her. I mean, He lay with her.
Bathsheba
conceived and David needed to cover up his sin. (Remember its cover up that
gets you rather than the initial crime.) He sent to the battlefront for her
husband, Uriah, to return. After asking him to report on the battle, he told
him to go home, eat at his table, sleep with his wife. Uriah replied “The Ark,
and Israel, and Judah, abide in tents: and my lord Joab, and the servants of
the lord, are encamped in the open fields; shall I then go into mine house, to
eat and to drink and to lie with my wife? As thou livest, and as thy soul
liveth, I will not do this thing.”[i] (Now
there’s a custom. While the country is at war, all soldiers will abstain from dwelling
indoors and sleeping with their wives. If everyone in the military followed this
custom today, we’d have fewer and shorter wars. If you included Congress and the
President, it might be the end to all American wars.)
King
David would not be foiled. He had Uriah stay another day. That night he feasted
him and got Uriah very drunk. But, Uriah still did not lie with his wife,
Bathsheba.
King
David sent a sealed message back to the front with Uriah. It commanded Joab to set
Uriah at the “forefront of the hottest battle.” He commanded Joab to retire the
rest of the army when Uriah was beset by the enemy so that he might be “smitten,
and die.” This was done and ‘some’ died, including Uriah the Hittite.
After
a short period of mourning, David took Bathsheba to be one of his wives.
Along
came Nathan, the Prophet. (Prophets weren’t so much future tellers as truth
speakers. Truth to Power. They said what is. They said what wasn’t being said, which
is why many of them were executed.) Nathan comes to King David and says “Hey
man, how’s it hanging?” (I always imagine the long haired, sandal wearing prophets
of the Old Testament being like the hippies of the 1960s.) “What’s shaking?” replies
David. (I always imagine the Kings of Israel trying talk like the prophets,
trying to be cool.)Nathan says “Some bad things are going down; you need to be
hearing.” “Talk to me brother.” says David.
Nathan
tells this story: “Down in the town, there was this rich man and this poor man.
The rich man had many oxen, sheep, goats and rams. The poor man had this one
ewe, this one little sheep. The poor man, he loved this ewe. He fed her off of
his own plate, let her drink from his own cup, let her sleep in his house with
this kids and family. This ewe was like a daughter to him. Well, you know what
happened, this rich man had a brother visit from out of town. He had his
servants take the poor man’s sheep rather than taking from his flock. He had it
slaughtered and feasted his brother.”
Hearing
this story, David got irate. He cursed and screamed saying “the man that hath
done this shall surely die.” And Nathan replied, “You be the Man!” Nathan said
that God said “I’ve given you all this. I took you from being a shepherd to
being King. I gave you riches and wives and power. I was planning to give you even
more than this. And, you go and do this evil in my sight. You have Uriah slain
along with others? Therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house. I
will raise up evil against thee in your own house.”
David
immediately repented of his sin[ii],
but he had done the deed. God’s wrath was upon him. The child died of an illness
shortly after being born. One of David’s sons raped one of his daughters.
Another son killed the rapist son, and then tried to overthrow his father along
with the trusted Joab who followed the order to have Uriah killed. David’s
story became a regular soap opera, like Dallas,
or the Petraeus Affair.
Ludwig
and Longenecker analyzed the cause and conditions of these failings in their
article. They found that they were not due to general low moral character. Actually
the ones who were most egregious in their acts were those who had been the most
moral and virtuous in their rise to success. The ethical violations did not lead
to the success but followed in the wake of success, more of a by-product than a
direct cause. It is the shadow side of success that is the potential pitfall.
Here
are the causes they listed:
1.
Success
often allows managers to become complacent and to lose focus, diverting
attention to things other than the management of their business.
2.
Success
whether personal or organizational, often leads to privileged access to
information, people or objects.
3.
With
success usually comes increasingly unrestrained control of organizational
resources.
4.
Success
can inflate a manager’s belief in his or her own personal ability to manipulate
outcomes.
They
found: “Even individuals with a highly developed moral sense can be challenged
(tempted?) by the “opportunities” resulting in the convergence of these
dynamics.”
I
can’t really speak to what happened with General Petraeus, or Eliot Spitzer, or
Clinton, or Madoff, or any of the countless others, but we might need to look
at how our very system sets them up for fail in such a huge way.
[i] This
is found in 2 Samuel 11 of the Bible. I like the King James Version. It's what my father, the Southern Baptist Minister preached. Also, my ability to understand Shakespeare was helped by being raised on the King James Version of the Bible. Did you know many Elizabethan/Jacobean Poets like Shakespeare helped write the King James Version of the Bible?
I reblogged and cited this great essay on mine: leadershipspirit.wordpress.com. Good work, Carey, and an excellent question. I believe the answer is partly in the weakness of followers. We give successful leaders a great deal of power and privilege, protecting them from consequences in smaller relationships and responsibilities. In the "success envelope" they begin to believe the hype about themselves and their gifts, plus they get very very lonely. Breaking moral rules gets easier under those conditions. And followers protect them, justify their smalller, to larger bad behaviors until the envelope tears because it's
ReplyDeletea.not real and b. impossible to maintain except if its inhabitant dies in glory.
Yes,
ReplyDeleteWe revere success in this country and put those that achieve it on a pedestal. We see them as kissed by the gods: supermen and superwomen. This is what adds to their hubris. (A word I wish I had used in the essay. I would define it as the pride of thinking you can behave as the gods.)They believe they are above the rules that other mortals must follow. In Greek Tragedy, hubris brings the downfall of the Kings and heroes.